a5c7b9f00b Batman has not been seen for ten years. A new breed of criminal ravages Gotham City, forcing 55-year-old Bruce Wayne back into the cape and cowl. But, does he still have what it takes to fight crime in a new era?
I'm a lifelong HUGE Batman fan, just 'The Dark Knight Returns" was never akin to my tastes. Still I decided to watch this making every effort to take on a fresh outlook, hoping it would help me see everything in a new light, but I'm sorry to say it made things worse by magnifying some of flaws I already sensed. When reading the comic I had a good sense of Batmanan amped up version of the rogue cop, with the established cops gunning for him, and that's the standout flaw. The cops gunning at Batman made the Stormtroopers look like certified sharpshooters, and they repeated that scenario OVER and OVER, making less and less confident in strength of the conflict facing Batman.<br/><br/>I do like Peter Weller's performancegritty Bats, and he makes his tough guy dialogue count. The actions scenes, not including rapid and inaccurate gunfire, do adrenalize. The story in the comic depicted Batman being far more aggressive and edgy than I prefer him to be, and I watched this knowing to expect that here. Between that issue I already had, Frank Miller's art style implemented which I'm not big on, some dialogue that feels shoehorned in (Carrie Kelly's parents talking about the sixties), anti-Reagan sentiment, andmentioned before–unrealistic depictions of dodging swaths of bullets, it didn't work for me. All power to Frank Miller die-hards (I myself am a Jeph Loeb die-hard) who felt refreshed over this oft called Batman magnum opus.
People might not think much of DVD movies, but this is one you won't want to miss! It makes me sad that 2D animated superhero movies won't be popular in theaters. I'm glad we at least have some medium to witness how good they are. I admit that I'm not that familiar with the Frank Miller comic. Well, a ton of Frank Miller stuff has been reviewed by Linkara, who doesn't have a high opinion of him. Anyway, this is based on a Frank Miller comic that features Batman retiring and deciding to come back after ten years. Yeah, I admit that the plot isn't that great. It's a little too simple, but this is still a great movie.<br/><br/>The best part is probably how you're blown away by how good the animation is. Animated shows are still 2D and it's gorgeous artwork like this that make you appreciate the technique. As farI know, this isn't a direct sequel to any other animated DC movie so it's easy enough for me to understand. The best parts are probably the fights with the Mutant leader. They're realistic and they're extremely intense for an animated film. It was weird and cool to watch a PG-13 cartoon movie. It lives up to its rating. It seems like they could have just made it into one fairly long movie. It's great to have things build up so well. ***1/2

The budgets for the DC Universe Animated Original Movies only allow for films of about 70 to 75 minutes in length. The graphic novel The Dark Knight Returns is long enough that it couldn't be adapteda single animated film without seriously compromising the original story. Therefore, the film has been split into two parts to allow for a more faithful adaptation. Fairly faithful. This movie is notfaithful the animated version of Frank Miller's Batman: Year One where the entire movie was a page for page recreation, but it is perhaps the second most faithful adaptation of a graphic novel to movie in the DC Animated series. Some scenes are changed around, some scenes are removed, some characters are visually altered but the story in the movie remains the samethe story in the graphic novel, and there are no sweeping changes to the original story. The biggest omission is that Batman does not have narration in the movie like he does in the graphic novel. In the graphic novel Frank Miller wrote a constant line of narration from the point of view of Batman's thoughts and his war journal. This narration did more than just explain the actions that the reader was seeing and actually revealed some important story information that was not otherwise seen or discussed. The filmmakers decided to leave out this narration and let the visual aspect of the story stand on its own. In the 1980s, the time when Frank Miller wrote The Dark Knight Returns graphic novel, Dick Grayson had already left Batman's side to become the hero Nightwing. He was replaced by an orphan and street hooligan named Jason Todd, whom readers greatly disliked. Eventually DC Comics created a publicity stunt to put Jason Todd's fate in the reader's hands. In a comic book story line called A Death in the Family, the Joker had beaten Jason Todd to near death. DC Comics then created a 1-900 phone number for readers to vote whether Todd lived or died. The votes were for his death and Jason was killed in the next issue. While no actual reference is given to how Jason died in The Dark Knight Returns, it is not unreasonable to assume that the events depicted in A Death in the Family could also have happened in the alternate timeline that The Dark Knight Returns takes place in. An interesting note is that The Dark Knight Returns was published 2 years before the storyline in which Jason Todd was murdered. Eventually a third Robin named Tim Drake would join Batman on his war on crime, but The Dark Knight Returns was written before that character was created and does not take this into account. For another DC animated film that deals with Jason ToddRobin, <a href="/title/tt1569923/">Batman: Under the Red Hood (2010)</a> may be of interest. It is not explained where Dick Grayson is during the events of this story. As stated, he was not the Robin that was killed and brought Bruce Wayne to decide on retiringBatman. In the original graphic novel when Batman is first defeated by the Mutant leader, Batman begins to monologue to himselfif he were speaking to Dick Grayson but does not reveal any information about his fate in this story. However, in Frank Miller's graphic novel sequel to this story Batman: The Dark Knight Strikes Again it is revealed that Dick Grayson went crazy from years of rejection from Batman and became the second Joker. It is set in an alternate version of the 1980s, in a similar mannerthe film adaptation of <a href="/title/tt0409459/">Watchmen (2009)</a>. When the story was originally written this was a contemporary time setting and only became an alternate history setting after it took many years to producea movie. For more of Frank Miller's take on Batman you may enjoy Batman: The Dark Knight Strikes Again, All-Star Batman and Robin the Boy Wonder, Batman: Year One and its <a href="/title/tt1672723/">animated adaptation</a>. For more of superheros in a dystopian future you may enjoy Paul Pope's Batman: Year 100 and Kaare Andrews' Spider-Man: Reign.
hindi SupermanBallmart tamil dubbed movie downloadFinal Justice 720p torrentDownload Scouts Guide to the Zombie Apocalypse full movie in hindi dubbed in Mp4The Streets of San Francisco full movie kickass torrentthe Super full movie in hindi free download hdHatya: The Murder download moviesSuperFly sub downloadfree download BatterTag tamil dubbed movie download